Open Access

Human health and environmental assessments of small-scale and artisanal mining activities in the Gold City of Ijeshaland, Southwestern Nigeria

Environmental Systems Research20176:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-017-0095-4

Received: 24 March 2017

Accepted: 6 July 2017

Published: 12 July 2017

Abstract

Background

This study assessed the health and environmental impacts of artisanal gold mining in Ijesha-land, Osun State, Southwestern Nigeria. Fifty-four environmental samples were collected between 2011 and 2012 and analyzed for major, trace and rare earth elements using standard procedures. Samples were collected from surface water (rivers and streams), groundwater, bottom sediments, fish (Tilapia) and aquatic plants (ferns). Data collected were analysed for simple descriptive and inferential statistics using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows (16.0). Human health risk assessment of noncarcinogenic adverse effects of elements in water and fish samples was determined.

Results

Higher concentrations of most major and trace elements were found in groundwater than surface water, while rare earth elements (REEs) were more concentrated in groundwater than surface water. Bottom sediment samples showed highest concentrations of Ti, Cs and Eu for major, trace and rare earth elements, respectively. The major and trace elements were most concentrated in the fish guts. The sum of REEs was observed highest in the fish guts (31.83 ± 35.90 µg kg−1), followed by muscle (18.70 ± 19.37 µg kg−1), while the lowest ΣREEs was measured in the gills (15.78 ± 22.45 µg kg−1). The human health risk assessment revealed low hazard quotient and hazard index values less than 1.0 for trace and rare earth elements in environmental samples.

Conclusions

The data obtained in this study showed that, the artisanal gold mining activities in the study area may contribute to long term environmental and human health risk.

Keywords

Gold miningElementsRisk assessmentEnvironmental samples

Background

Mining takes place where minerals are available and economically viable. Natural resources, especially metallic and non-metallic minerals are important in the national development. The importance of mining sector includes foreign exchange earnings, employment generation and economic development (Nwajiuba 2000; Obaje et al. 2005). Artisanal and small-scale mining are means of livelihood adopted primarily in the rural areas (Veiga 2003), where minerals are mined using simple tools and equipment on a small scale (Bradshaw 1997; Hruschka 2011). This practice is an informal sector, which is outside the legal and regulatory framework (Azubike 2011).

The discovery of gold in Ijeshaland of Osun State, although mined on a small scale basis, provides thousands of indigenous peoples with employment (Taiwo and Awomeso 2017). The negative impacts on the community since the inception of the small scale mining activities were rapid loss of farm lands, water and soil pollution, and problems of managing the mine wastes (Taiwo and Awomeso 2017). Contaminations of surface and ground water bodies have particularly been experienced in gold mining communities in Nigeria (Galadima et al. 2011; Ayantobo et al. 2014a, b). Generally, artisanal gold miners are affected by numbers of challenges including occupational, environmental and social impacts (Hruschka 2011). The major environmental and health concerns of artisanal and small scale gold mining are elemental mercury emissions and cyanide toxicity with consequent effects on humans, animals, plants and aquatic organisms (Eisler and Wiemeyer 2004; Barreto 2011; Nakazawa et al. 2016).

The negative environmental and health impacts of artisanal gold mining activities in many countries of the world had been reported in published studies, e.g. Dooyema et al. (2012), Barreto (2011), Hruschka (2011), Plumlee et al. (2013), Ayantobo et al. (2014a, b), Arifin et al. (2015), Basu et al. (2015), Rajaee et al. (2015), Nakazawa et al. (2016) and Obiri et al. (2016). Most of these studies lacked explicit information on the impacts of gold mining activities on multiple environmental indices such as surface water, groundwater, floating plants, the bottom sediments and fish. The first part of this research work had reported the human risk assessments (carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic) of essential and nonessential trace metals in environmental samples (Taiwo and Awomeso 2017). The health risk assessment established the noncarcinogenic adverse effects of toxic metals including Al, Fe, Hg and Tl having the hazard quotient (HQ) values greater than 1.0 in water and fish samples. The study also revealed high cancer risk values for As, Cr, Cd, Ni and Pb. Similar study on health risk assessment in water and sediment samples collected from the vicinity of artisanal goldmining activities had reported high cancer risk values for As, Cr and Cd (Obiri et al. 2016). The main objective of this study is to assess element concentrations and health risk associated with artisanal gold mining operations in the gold city of Ijeshaland, Osun State.

Methods

The study area

The study areas are the gold mine sites in the gold city of Ijeshaland, Osun State. Around these mining sites are major towns such as Igun-Ijesha, Iperindo, Ijana Wasare, Itagunmodi, and Isanlu (Taiwo and Awomeso 2017). The gold mine sites were within one of the six classes of the Basement Complex rock from slightly a migmatised to nonmigmatised, metasedimentary, metasedimentary and metaigneous rock known as the Schist belt (Ayantobo et al. 2014a, b). The belt is one of the eleven Schist belts discussed in Ademeso et al. (2013) as a part of Ilesha Ife Schist belt. Two contrasting lithologies separated by NNE-SSW trending shear system were identified in the study area (Ayantobo et al. 2014a, b). The eastern part possesses quartzite, quartz schist and amphibole schist. The gold deposit occurs in the eastern area that lies on the east of Ifewara fault zone. Detailed description and geology of the study area had been discussed in Taiwo and Awomeso (2017). Figure 1 shows the map of sampling locations in the study area.
Fig. 1

Map showing the sampling sites in Ijeshaland, Osun State, Southwestern Nigeria (Taiwo and Awomeso 2017)

Sample collection and analysis

A total of fifty-four environmental samples (surface water, groundwater, the bottom sediments, floating plants and fish) were collected within the vicinity of the gold mining sites between 2011 and 2012. Samples were analyzed for major, trace and rare earth elements using standard procedure (APHA 2005). Samples were digested with concentrated acids (HNO3, H2SO4 and HClO4) as described in Taiwo and Awomeso (2017). The analyzed parts of fish samples were the gills, the guts and muscle. All digested samples were sent to the ACME Analytical Laboratory in Canada for analysis of elements (major, trace and rare earth) using the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrophotometer (ICPMS) instrument. The procedures of ICPMS had been described in Taiwo et al. (2014).

All analytical chemicals were of ultra-pure grade. Blank samples were also run to cancel the impurities introduced by the extracting reagents (Taiwo et al. 2014).

Data analysis

Data collected were analyzed for descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential (Student’s t test) statistics using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 16.0.

Health risk assessment

The health risk assessment for trace metals were calculated for average daily dose (ADD), noncancer hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) using the procedures described in USEPA (2002, 2007, 2012).

Average daily dose was calculated as:
$${\text{ADD}} = \frac{{\text{C}} \times {\text{IR}} \times {\text{ED}} \times {\text{EF}}} {{\text{BW}} \times {\text{AT}}}\,$$
(2)
where, ADD = average daily dose in drinking water or fish (μg kg−1 day−1), IR = Ingestion rate of water or fish; water = 2 L day−1 for an adult, 1 L day−1 for a child, 0.75 L day−1 for an infant (Ayedun et al. 2015); Fish = 24.7 g day−1 for an adult based on the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) annual per capita fish consumption statistics for Nigeria given as 9.0 kg (FAO 2008).

C = Concentration of trace metals in water (μg L−1) or fish (μg kg−1) samples, BW = Body weight (kg); 60 kg for an adult, 10 kg for a child, 5 kg for an infant (Ayantobo et al. 2014a).

EF = Exposure frequency (day year−1) = 350 days year−1, ED = Exposure duration (years) = 30 years for an adult, 6 years for a child and 1 year for an infant (USEPA 2001; enHealth 2012).

AT = Averaging time = life expectancy (years), AT = ED for noncarcinogenic effects, while AT = 54.5 years (53 years for men and 56 years for women) for carcinogenic effects on adult (WHO 2015) (It should be noted that the averaging time for an infant and a child was based on their lifetime exposure where AT = ED).

Noncancer hazard index (HI) was calculated as the sum of hazard quotients (HQ)
$${\text{HI }} = \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} HQ$$
(3)
i = 1…n
$${\text{Hazard quotient }}\left( {\text{HQ}} \right) \, = \frac{\text{ADD}}{\text{RfD}}$$
(4)
where, ADD = average daily dose in drinking water and fish (μg kg−1 day−1), RfD = reference dose (µg kg−1 day−1) adapted from USEPA (2001), N = numbers of elements observed.

HQ/HI > 1 indicates noncarcinogenic adverse effects, HQ/HI < 1 indicates no adverse effects.

Results and discussion

Major element concentrations in environmental samples

Table 1 shows the average concentrations of major elements observed in surface water, groundwater, bottom sediments, fish and the plant samples. P (0.03 ± 0.04 mg L−1) and Si (10.44 ± 3.45 mg L−1) were observed at significantly higher concentrations (p < 0.05) in surface water than groundwater by 67 and 17%, respectively. The presence of P in surface water may be linked to point source pollution from the mining activities.
Table 1

Major element concentrations of environmental samples collected at the vicinity of the gold mines

 

Surface water (N = 19)

Groundwater (N = 9)

Sediment (N = 10)

Fish muscle (N = 4)

Fish gills (N = 4)

Fish gut (N = 4)

Plant (N = 12)

Mean (mg L−1)

SD

Mean (mg L−1)

SD

Mean (mg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (mg kg−1)

SD

Ca

11.78

4.25

37.30

33.86

0.53

0.69

230.5

343.9

702.0

816.2

116.50

130.6

2.26

2.99

K

6.07

3.30

64.99

66.24

0.07

0.12

34.87

13.67

26.50

21.38

33.32

18.45

1.43

0.51

Mg

5.23

2.78

15.01

14.47

0.38

0.21

10.34

4.96

17.01

14.68

6.80

2.44

0.20

0.07

Na

5.23

5.41

14.40

19.43

0.03

0.02

3.53

7.02

4.03

7.16

5.12

10.21

0.09

0.04

P

0.03

0.04

0.01

0.04

0.03

0.00

136.7

164.2

376.2

396.8

96.77

82.44

0.19

0.03

Si

10.44

3.54

8.67

3.61

  

4.32

3.72

3.93

4.94

4.34

2.46

  

Ti

0.01

0.02

0.01

0.00

2.53

1.43

0.30

0.33

0.16

0.10

0.30

0.23

41.00

41.71

SD standard deviation

This value of P observed in the surface water around the Ijeshaland gold mines was within the recommended phosphorus value of 0.03 mg L−1 in surface water (Canadian Ministry of the Environment and Energy 1994). Above this value is possible bloom of algae on the surface water with diverse ecological impacts on aquatic organisms (NdumI 2015). High concentration of phosphorus in surface water may also be attributable to human activities such as agriculture, land-use and industrialization (Olajire and Imeokparia 2001; Taiwo 2012a, b).

Ca (37.30 ± 33.86 mg L−1), K (64.99 ± 66.24 mg L−1), Mg (15.01 ± 14.47 mg L−1) and Na (14.44 ± 19.43 mg L−1) concentrations were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in groundwater than surface water samples. The presence of higher values of Ca, K, Mg and Na in groundwater may be associated to weathering of bedrock (Gbadebo et al. 2010; Odukoya 2015). The values of these metals were generally lower than the WHO permissible standards (WHO 2011). In this present study, the observed silica concentrations (10.44 ± 3.45 mg L−1 in surface water and 8.67 ± 3.61 mg L−1 in groundwater) were higher than the value of 5.0 mg L−1 naturally found in water (Gbadebo et al. 2013). Although, there is no permissible limit for silica in drinking water; the values obtained in this study was higher than the value that is naturally found in water which might indicate pollution from the gold mining activities.

Ti was the highest measured element in the bottom sediments. Most of the measured parameters in the bottom sediment samples were lower than the WHO permissible standard (WHO 2004). In fish samples, Ca and P were the major elements measured in the gills, while K showed the highest value in muscle and Na in the guts. Most of the major elements were concentrated in the gills because it accumulates pollutants from the aquatic environment and serves as the respiratory and excretory organ (Uzairu et al. 2009; Sharon and Zilberg 2012).

In plant samples, the order of abundance of major elements was Ti > Ca > Mg > K. The Ti concentration in plant samples was very high when compared to Ti values measured in water, sediment and fish samples.

By calculating the bioaccumulation factor (BF) for Ti concentration in plant revealed an extremely high value of 4100. The implication of this is that, most of the Ti released into the surface water was mopped up by the plant. This also reveals the hyper-accumulating ability of fern plants.

Trace element concentrations in environmental samples

The average concentrations of the trace elements measured in the environmental samples are presented in Table 2. Most of the trace elements were generally observed at higher concentrations in groundwater than surface water except Br, Ga and Zr.
Table 2

Trace element concentrations of samples collected at the vicinity of the gold mines

 

Surface water (N = 19)

Groundwater (N = 9)

Sediment (N = 10)

Fish muscle (N = 4)

Fish gills (N = 4)

Fish gut (N = 4)

Plant (N = 12)

Mean (µg L−1)

SD

Mean (µg L−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

B

11.00

4.30

25.50

30.40

9.74

6.29

0.03

0.01

0.04

0.02

0.03

0.01

6.17

2.71

Be

0.03

0.02

0.16

0.20

0.18

0.11

0.13

0.15

0.05

0.06

0.18

0.24

  

Cl

6211

3789

49,625

53,566

<0.1

 

4.63

2.87

7.00

8.95

7.50

1.91

  

Br

56.63

116.25

<0.01

 

0.97

0.92

24.38

14.59

35.75

41.54

56.00

22.20

  

Cs

0.04

0.05

0.69

1.04

77.00

63.65

0.32

0.35

0.20

0.30

0.67

0.86

  

Ga

0.09

0.21

0.03

0.00

46.00

22.72

1.00

1.35

0.36

0.41

1.31

1.27

0.92

1.20

Ge

<0.01

0.02

0.03

0.02

<0.01

 

0.15

0.12

0.08

0.08

0.13

0.13

  

Hf

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

0.95

0.67

0.20

0.22

0.01

0.01

0.04

0.02

  

In

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

   

Pd

<0.2

 

<0.2

 

<0.2

 

<0.2

 

<0.2

 

<0.2

   

Pt

<0.01

 

<0.01

   

0.08

0.06

0.05

0.05

1.11

2.03

  

Rb

10.42

5.77

29.28

26.62

14.20

5.37

43.97

50.28

29.48

49.49

56.36

42.16

  

Re

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

   

Rh

0.03

0.02

0.03

0.02

  

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.03

0.02

  

Ru

<0.05

 

<0.01

   

0.03

0.00

0.03

0.01

0.03

0.00

  

S

1.60

3.14

12.36

13.33

  

65.25

29.64

43.50

25.56

46.25

9.03

  

Se

0.37

0.20

4.91

4.71

0.75

0.35

10.99

11.25

10.88

16.12

20.73

6.08

0.17

0.12

Sn

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.001

1.25

0.49

9.57

16.68

9.02

15.60

8.76

13.32

  

Sr

88.64

48.47

237.92

268.86

26.50

10.61

0.57

0.87

1.24

1.22

0.24

0.21

59.95

39.49

Ta

<0.02

 

<0.02

 

0.15

0.07

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.001

0.02

0.01

  

Te

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

<0.01

 

0.03

0.001

0.05

0.04

0.06

0.04

0.01

0.01

Th

<0.05

 

<0.05

 

29.40

7.64

0.61

0.35

0.68

0.66

0.49

0.37

0.08

0.12

Tl

0.01

0.01

0.12

0.12

0.03

0.001

0.10

0.13

0.11

0.18

0.65

0.88

0.03

0.03

U

0.02

0.01

0.04

0.07

1.30

0.85

0.46

0.18

0.50

0.33

0.80

0.60

0.07

0.08

U

0.02

0.01

0.04

0.07

1.30

0.85

0.46

0.18

0.50

0.33

0.80

0.60

0.07

0.08

W

0.04

0.03

0.05

0.02

0.35

0.35

      

0.10

0.08

Zr

0.19

0.45

0.01

0.001

65.95

66.11

       

0.05

SD standard deviation

The high levels of these metals in groundwater might be linked to seepage of acid mine drainage into the aquifer and possible contaminations from pitting exercise during the gold mining operation (Frank, 2013). The most abundant trace elements measured in the bottom sediments were Cs, Zr, Ga, Th and Sr. These trace elements were extremely higher than those measured in surface and groundwater. The order of abundance of trace elements in fish samples follows: S > Rb > Br > Se > Sn. The sum of trace elements was observed highest in the fish guts followed by the gills and muscle. The trace element concentrations in different parts of the fish samples analyzed revealed the guts as the most contaminated site contrary to the studies of Uzairu et al. (2009) and Ishaq et al. (2011). This anomaly can be explained by the antagonistic effect of Ca on other metals. According to Ghosh and Adhikari (2006), Ca has an antagonistic effect on metal accumulation in fish gills and muscle. The study by Avenant-Oldewage and Marx (2000) had demonstrated higher levels of Fe and Cr in fish muscle than gills. Generally, metal accumulation by fish depends on many factors including sex, age, size, reproductive cycle, swimming patterns, feeding behavior and geographical location (El-Moselhy et al. 2014).

The trace metal levels measured in the aquatic plants are generally low. The most abundant trace elements measured in plant samples were Sr and B. The risks of Sr (stable form) and B to aquatic ecosystem are usually very low (Howe 1998).

Rare earth element concentrations in environmental samples

The mean concentrations of REEs observed in the environmental samples are shown in Table 3. Scandium showed the highest concentration of REE in surface water (1.00 ± 0.65 µg L−1) and groundwater (0.81 ± 0.63 µg L−1). Most of the REEs were observed at higher concentrations in groundwater than surface water. Europium (Eu) (98.50 ± 94.22 µg kg−1) was the most abundant REE measured in the bottom sediments followed by Ce (31.30 ± 64.22 µg kg−1) and La (16.67 ± 28.88 µg kg−1). In fish samples, the sums of REEs were 31.81 ± 35.90 µg kg−1 in the guts, 18.70 ± 19.37 µg kg−1 in muscle and 15.78 ± 22.45 µg kg−1 in the gills.
Table 3

Mean concentrations of rare earth elements (REES) in samples

 

Surface water

Groundwater

Sediment

Fish muscle

Fish gill

Fish gut

Mean (µg L−1)

SD

Mean (µg L−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Mean (µg kg−1)

SD

Ce

0.24

0.44

0.15

0.29

31.30

62.42

8.94

9.66

6.58

10.50

15.85

17.76

Dy

<0.01

 

0.03

0.05

0.02

0.01

0.26

0.29

0.26

0.41

0.51

0.60

Er

<0.01

 

0.02

0.03

7.25

2.25

0.95

1.34

0.10

0.15

0.33

0.32

Eu

<0.01

 

0.01

0.01

98.50

94.22

0.05

0.06

0.06

0.11

0.12

0.15

Gd

0.02

0.03

0.05

0.07

0.04

0.02

0.36

0.40

0.41

0.68

0.73

0.83

Ho

<0.01

0.00

0.01

0.01

0.15

0.17

0.07

0.05

0.04

0.05

0.10

0.12

La

0.13

0.25

0.53

0.90

16.67

28.88

3.58

3.02

3.57

3.46

5.99

6.86

Lu

<0.01

0.001

0.01

0.001

<0.01

 

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.04

0.04

Nd

0.10

0.16

0.29

0.46

  

2.64

2.98

2.61

4.29

5.01

5.83

Pr

0.03

0.04

0.08

0.11

  

0.66

0.75

0.64

1.04

1.28

1.47

Sc

1.00

0.65

0.81

0.63

  

0.63

0.25

0.88

0.76

0.88

0.75

Sm

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.06

  

0.45

0.50

0.54

0.88

0.86

1.02

Tb

0.01

0.001

0.01

0.01

  

0.07

0.05

0.07

0.10

0.10

0.12

Tm

0.01

0.001

0.01

0.001

  

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.03

0.04

Y

0.08

0.17

0.47

0.79

        

Yb

0.01

0.02

0.02

0.02

        

SD standard deviation

The abundance of REEs in fish sample follows similar pattern as trace metal distribution in the fish parts i.e. guts > muscle > gills. The toxicity of REEs had been reported to increase mortalities of aquatic and terrestrial organisms, and humans (Paul and Campbell 2011). Exposure to REEs through consumption of contaminated fish may result into accumulation of REEs in the body. This can initiate serious health effects in humans (Chester-Paul 2013). Genotoxicity of REEs in bone marrow cells has been identified by Chen and Zhu (2008). REEs were not measured in the plant samples.

Health risk assessment

Additional file 1: Tables S1–S9 show the average daily dose (ADD) values of major, trace and rare earth elements in surface water, groundwater and fish samples. The ADD values showed highest values for major elements followed by trace elements, while REEs had the lowest ADD values in all the environmental samples. The ADD was calculated from the concentration of elements measured in water (groundwater and surface water) and fish (muscle) samples. The calculation was based on the assumption that a matured adult weighing 60 kg consumes 2 L of water per day, while a child weighing 10 kg consumes 1 L of water per day and an infant weighing 5 kg consumes 0.75 L of water per day (USEPA 2002; 2007). The corresponding ADD and weekly intake values of elements in surface water were lower for Ba and higher for Ce (by 2 times), Ga and Zr (3 times) Nb (8 times) in groundwater. Despite the fact that an infant (of lower body weight) consumes less quantity of water compared to an adult (of higher body weight); an infant would take more of these toxic elements in water than an adult by five times. Likewise, a child would take a triple dose of these elements more than an adult.

The average daily intake data of elements in fish samples are also presented Additional file 1: Tables S3, S6 and S9. It is assumed that an adult weighing 60 kg consumes 24.7 g fish daily in Nigeria (FAO 2008). High ADD values were observed for Ca, Na, Mg, K, P and Si. Calcium, sodium, magnesium and potassium are essential elements required for proper functioning of body e.g. growth and muscle building, regulation of acid–base, cell osmotic balance, enzyme cofactor, and cardiac function (Soetan et al. 2010). The most dosed trace elements in groundwater, surface water and fish samples were Sr, Br and Cl. These elements are of environmental and health concerns. The stable Sr is not harmful, but the radioactive Sr is deleterious to human health, while Cl is toxic to aquatic animals (Lenntech 2017). Organic Br can be very damaging to human health through damage to DNA, enhancing the change of cancer development (Lenntech 2017).

Table 4 shows the hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) values of elements whose oral reference dose (RfD) values are available in literature. The sum of risks due to noncarcinogenic adverse effects of trace elements was higher in groundwater than surface water. An infant who consumes water samples collected around the goldmine areas would be two times adversely exposed to these toxic metals than a child and five times than an adult.
Table 4

Non-cancer hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) values of elements in water and fish samples

 

Surface water

Groundwater

Fish

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Adult

 B

1.8E−03

6.7E−04

9.6E−04

3.4E−03

4.0E−03

4.9E−03

4.0E−04

1.4E−02

5.6E−04

1.6E−04

4.1E−04

7.7E−04

 Be

5.0E−04

3.3E−04

4.0E−04

1.8E−03

2.5E−03

3.2E−03

4.0E−04

9.3E−03

2.5E−04

3.0E−04

4.9E−05

6.9E−04

 Se

2.4E−03

1.2E−03

1.6E−03

5.1E−03

3.0E−02

3.0E−02

1.6E−03

7.4E−02

8.7E−03

8.9E−03

2.0E−04

1.9E−02

 Sr

4.7E−03

2.5E−03

9.8E−04

9.8E−03

1.5E−02

1.4E−02

5.9E−04

3.7E−02

3.8E−03

5.7E−03

6.0E−04

1.2E−02

 Tl

5.7E−03

3.8E−03

2.0E−03

1.6E−02

4.3E−02

4.9E−02

4.0E−03

1.4E−01

5.1E−03

6.6E−03

2.5E−04

1.5E−02

 U

2.1E−04

1.7E−04

1.1E−04

6.4E−04

5.8E−04

7.7E−04

1.1E−04

2.2E−03

6.0E−04

2.4E−04

3.4E−04

9.2E−04

 HI

0.015

0.009

0.006

0.037

0.095

0.102

0.007

0.277

0.019

0.022

0.002

0.048

Child

 B

5.3E−03

2.0E−03

2.9E−03

1.0E−02

1.2E−02

1.5E−02

1.2E−03

4.2E−02

3.4E−03

9.7E−04

2.5E−03

4.6E−03

 Be

1.5E−03

9.9E−04

1.2E−03

5.3E−03

7.4E−03

9.5E−03

1.2E−03

2.8E−02

1.5E−03

1.8E−03

3.0E−04

4.1E−03

 Se

7.1E−03

3.7E−03

4.8E−03

1.5E−02

9.1E−02

9.0E−02

4.8E−03

2.2E−01

5.2E−02

5.3E−02

1.2E−03

1.1E−01

 Sr

1.4E−02

7.6E−03

2.9E−03

2.9E−02

4.6E−02

4.3E−02

1.8E−03

1.1E−01

2.3E−02

3.4E−02

3.6E−03

7.4E−02

 Tl

1.7E−02

1.1E−02

6.0E−03

4.8E−02

1.3E−01

1.5E−01

1.2E−02

4.2E−01

3.1E−02

4.0E−02

1.5E−03

8.9E−02

 U

6.4E−04

5.1E−04

3.2E−04

1.9E−03

1.7E−03

2.3E−03

3.2E−04

6.7E−03

3.6E−03

1.4E−03

2.1E−03

5.5E−03

 HI

0.046

0.026

0.018

0.110

0.286

0.306

0.021

0.830

0.114

0.132

0.011

0.290

Infant

 B

7.9E−03

3.0E−03

4.3E−03

1.5E−02

1.8E−02

2.2E−02

1.8E−03

6.3E−02

7.9E−03

3.0E−03

4.3E−03

1.5E−02

 Be

2.3E−03

1.5E−03

1.8E−03

7.9E−03

1.1E−02

1.4E−02

1.8E−03

4.2E−02

2.3E−03

1.5E−03

1.8E−03

7.9E−03

 Se

1.1E−02

5.6E−03

7.2E−03

2.3E−02

1.4E−01

1.4E−01

7.2E−03

3.3E−01

1.1E−02

5.6E−03

7.2E−03

2.3E−02

 Sr

2.1E−02

1.1E−02

4.4E−03

4.4E−02

6.9E−02

6.4E−02

2.6E−03

1.7E−01

2.1E−02

1.1E−02

4.4E−03

4.4E−02

 Tl

2.6E−02

1.7E−02

9.0E−03

7.2E−02

1.9E−01

2.2E−01

1.8E−02

6.3E−01

2.6E−02

1.7E−02

9.0E−03

7.2E−02

 U

9.6E−04

7.7E−04

4.8E−04

2.9E−03

2.6E−03

3.5E−03

4.8E−04

1.0E−02

9.6E−04

7.7E−04

4.8E − 04

2.9E − 03

 HI

0.069

0.039

0.027

0.165

0.429

0.459

0.032

1.245

0.069

0.039

0.027

0.165

The ΣHQ for adult, children and infants in surface water, groundwater and fish samples were generally less than 1.0 indicating non-carcinogenic adverse effects. However, long term exposure to these metals may have serious consequence on human health. The ΣHQ for nonessential trace metals previously reported by Taiwo and Awomeso (2017) was higher than 1.0. The pattern of abundance of HQ for adults, children and infants in this study follows: Tl > Sr > Se > B>Be > U in groundwater, surface water and fish samples. The HI showed the highest values in groundwater followed by surface water and fish samples similar to the reported HI values for essential and nonessential elements (Taiwo and Awomeso 2017).

Conclusions

This study had assessed the human health and environmental impacts of artisanal gold mining activities in the gold city of Ijeshaland, Osun State, Southwest Nigeria. Ca and Si were the most abundant major elements in water and fish samples. The sum of trace elements and REEs were observed at the highest concentrations in the fish guts. The most abundant trace elements measured in the bottom sediments were Cs, Zr, Ga, Th and Sr. In plant samples, Ti and Sr were the most abundant major and trace elements. Most of the analyzed elements showed concentrations not higher than the permissible standards of the World Health Organization. The health risk assessment data showed Sr, Br and Cl as the most dosed trace elements in groundwater, surface water and fish samples. The hazard quotient and hazard index values for metals were generally less than 1.0 in water and fish samples indicating no adverse health effects. The human health assessment of noncarcinogenic adverse effects revealed the greatest risk in groundwater samples followed by surface water samples. This study established that infants were at the greatest risk of noncarcinogenic effects despite their low body weight. The data obtained in this study showed that the artisanal gold mining in the study area may contribute to long term environmental and human health risks.

Abbreviations

ADD: 

average daily dose

HI: 

hazard index

HQ: 

hazard quotient

ICPMS: 

inductively coupled plasma mass spectrophotometer

REEs: 

rare earth elements

RfD: 

reference dose

SD: 

standard deviation

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JAA collected the data, AMT analyzed the data. JAA and AMT drafted the manuscript, while EOD and OOA participated in proofreading the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciated the laboratory assistance rendered by ACME Analytical Laboratory, Canada. We are also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work is supported by Multiple Development Services Ltd, Lagos (MDS2010-001).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Water Resources Management and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Agriculture
(2)
Department of Environmental Management & Toxicology, Federal University of Agriculture
(3)
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Joseph Ayo Babalola University
(4)
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University

References

  1. Ademeso OA, Adekoya JA, Adetunji A (2013) Further evidences of cataclasis in the ife-ilesa schistbelt, Southwestern Nigeria. J Nat Sci Res 3:50–59Google Scholar
  2. APHA (American Public Health Association) (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. In: Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE, Franson MAH (eds), 21st edn. APHA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Arifin YI, Sakakibara M, Sera K (2015) Impacts of Artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) on environment and human health of Gorontalo Utara Regency, Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. Geosciences 5(2):160–176View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Avenant-Oldewage A, Marx HM (2000) Bioaccumulation of chromium, copper and iron in the organs and tissues of Clarias gariepinus in the Olifants River, Kruger National Park. Water SA 26(4):569–580Google Scholar
  5. Ayantobo OO, Awomeso JA, Oluwasanya GO, Bada BS, Taiwo AM (2014a) Non-cancer human health risk assessment from exposure to heavy metals in surface and groundwater in Igun Ijesha, Southwest Nigeria. Am J Environ Sci 10(3):301–310View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayantobo OO, Awomeso JA, Oluwasanya GO, Bada BS, Taiwo AM (2014b) Gold mining in Igun-Ijesha, Southwest Nigeria: impacts and implications for water quality. Am J Environ Sci 10:289–300View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayedun H, Gbadebo AM, Idowu OA, Arowolo TA (2015) Toxic elements in groundwater of Lagos and Ogun States, Southwest, Nigeria and their human health risk assessment. Environ Monit Assess 187(6):1–17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Azubike AL (2011) The technology of peaty soils in Mozambique and Angola. Transactions of the 5th international congress of soil science. Leopoldville 3:398–401Google Scholar
  9. Barreto L (2011) Analysis for stakeholders on formalization in the artisanal and small-scale gold mining sector based on experiences in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. United Nations Environment Programme. pp 1–85Google Scholar
  10. Basu N, Clarke E, Green A, Calys-Tagoe B, Chan L, Dzodzomenyo M, Fobil J, Long RN, Neitzel RL, Obiri S, Ode E (2015) Integrated assessment of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Ghana—Part 1: human health review. Inter J Environ Res Publ Health 12:5143–5176View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradshaw A (1997) Restoration of mined lands—using natural processes. Ecol Eng 8(4):255–269View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Canadian Ministry of the Environment and Energy (1994) Water management policies, guidelines provincial water quality objectives of the ministry of environment and energy. http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/330e.htm. Accessed 11 Nov 2016
  13. Chen ZY, Zhu XD (2008) Accumulation of rare earth elements in bone and its toxicity and potential hazard to health. J Ecol Rural Environ 1:1–19Google Scholar
  14. Chester-Paul K (2013) A review of environmental and health concerns of rare earth elements (ree): cautionary notes on an increasingly important geologic resource. In: 2013 GSA Annual Meeting in DenverGoogle Scholar
  15. Dooyema CA, Neri A, Lo YC, Durant J, Dargan PI, Swarthout T, Nguku PM (2012) Outbreak of fatal childhood lead poisoning related to artisanal gold mining in northwestern Nigeria, 2010. Environ Health Perspect 120(4):601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisler R, Wiemeyer SN (2004) Cyanide hazards to plants and animals from gold mining and related water issues. In: Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, New York, pp. 21–54Google Scholar
  17. El-Moselhy KM, Othman AI, El-Azem HA, El-Metwally MEA (2014) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in some tissues of fish in the Red Sea, Egypt. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci 1(2):97–105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. enHealth (2012) Environmental health risk assessment-Guidelines for assessing human health risks from environmental hazards. D0702. http://www.health.gov.au. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  19. FAO (2008) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2008. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank BNM (2013) Exploring the linkages between land management institutions, land degradation and acid mine drainage: the case of the west rand goldfield. Master of Science dissertation of the Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment. University of the Witwatersrand, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  21. Galadima A, Garba ZN, Leke L, Almustapha MN, Adam IK (2011) Domestic water pollution among local communities in Nigeria-causes and consequences. Euro J Sci Res 52(4):592–603Google Scholar
  22. Gbadebo AM, Taiwo AM, Ayedun H, Adeola AJ (2010) Geochemical analysis of groundwater quality in Agbara and environs. Appl Ecol Environ Res 10(3):375–384View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gbadebo AM, Taiwo AM, Adeola AJ (2013) Assessment of dissolved silica content of groundwater from Southwestern Nigeria. J Hum Ecol 43(3):273–279Google Scholar
  24. Ghosh L, Adhikari S (2006) Accumulation of heavy metals in freshwater fish–an assessment of toxic interactions with calcium. Am J Food Technol 1:139–148View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Howe PD (1998) A review of boron effects in the environment. Biol Trace Elem Res 66(1–3):153–166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hruschka F (2011) SDC experiences with formalization and responsible environmental practices in artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Latin America and Asia (Mongolia)Google Scholar
  27. Ishaq ES, Sha’Ato R, Annune PA (2011) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in fish (Tilapia zilli and Clarias gariepinus) organs from River Benue, North-Central Nigeria. Pak J Anal Environ Chem 12(1&2):25–31Google Scholar
  28. Lenntech (2017) Periodic table. http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements. Accessed 30 Jan 2017
  29. Nakazawa K, Nagafuchi O, Kawakami T, Inoue T, Yokota K, Serikawa Y, Elvince R (2016) Human health risk assessment of mercury vapor around artisanal small-scale gold mining area, Palu city, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 124:155–162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. NdumI MJ (2015) Biochemical effects of sewage pollution on the benthic organism Nerita polita (Doctoral dissertation, Kenyatta University)Google Scholar
  31. Nwajiuba CU (2000) Socio-economic impact of solid minerals prospecting on host communities. A study of Okaba, Kogi State, Nigeria. Technical Report to the Nigerian Coal corporation, EnuguGoogle Scholar
  32. Obaje NG, Nzegbuna AI, Moumouni A, Ukaonu CE (2005) Geology and Mineral Resources of Nasarawa State, Nigeria. A preliminary Investigation. Paper presented at the 4th Nasarawa State Agricultural and Solid Minerals Exposition held at Agyaragu, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, 21–23 March, p 1–27Google Scholar
  33. Obiri S, Yeboah PO, Osae S, Adu-kumi S, Cobbina SJ, Armah FA, Ason B, Antwi E, Quansah R (2016) Human health risk assessment of artisanal miners exposed to toxic chemicals in water and sediments in the PresteaHuni Valley District of Ghana. InterJ Environ Res Pub Health 12:139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Odukoya AM (2015) Geochemical and quality assessment of groundwater in some Nigerian basement complex. InterJ Environ Sci Technol 12(11):3643–3656View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Olajire AA, Imeokparia FE (2001) Water quality assessment of Osun River: studies on inorganic nutrients. Environ Monit Assess 69(1):17–28View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Paul J, Campbell G (2011) Investigating rare earth element mine development in EPA region 8 and potential environmental impacts. A National Service Center for Environmental PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  37. Plumlee GS, Morman SA, Meeker GP, Hoefen TM, Hageman PL, Wolf RE (2013) The environmental and medical geochemistry of potentially hazardous materials produced by disasters. Treat Geochem 11:257–304Google Scholar
  38. Rajaee M, Sánchez BN, Renne EP, Basu N (2015) An investigation of organic and inorganic mercury exposure and blood pressure in a small-scale gold mining community in Ghana, I. Inter J Environ Res Pub Health 12:10020–10038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharon G, Zilberg D (2012) Atlas of fish histology and histopathology. 76p. http://www.moprn.org/moprn2012/fish/fish1.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2015
  40. Soetan KO, Olaiya CO, Oyewole OE (2010) The importance of mineral elements for humans, domestic animals and plants—a review. Afr J Food Sci 4(5):200–222Google Scholar
  41. Taiwo AM (2012) Source identification and apportionment of pollution sources to groundwater quality in major cities in Southwest, Nigeria. Geofizika 29(2):157–174Google Scholar
  42. Taiwo AM, Awomeso JA (2017) Assessment of trace metal concentration and health risk of artisanal gold mining activities in Ijeshaland, Osun State Nigeria—Part 1. J Geochem Explor 177:1–10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Taiwo AM, Olujimi OO, Bamgbose O, Arowolo TA (2012) Surface water quality monitoring in Nigeria: situational analysis and future management strategy. In: Voudouris K, Voutsa D (eds). Water quality monitoring and assessment 13, 301–320. 978-953-51-0486-5Google Scholar
  44. Taiwo AM, Beddows DC, Shi Z, Harrison RM (2014) Mass and number size distributions of particulate matter components: comparison of an industrial site and an urban background site. Sci Total Environ 475:29–38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2001) Risk assessment guidance for superfund: process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment (Part A); EPA 540-R-02-002. Vol 3. USEPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  46. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Integrated risk Information system (IRIS) database. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  47. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) Framework for metal risk assessment. EPA 120-R-07-001. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  48. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2012) Edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-S-12-001Google Scholar
  49. Uzairu A, Harrison GFS, Balarabe ML, Nnaji JC (2009) Concentration levels of trace metals in fish and sediment from Kubanni river, northern Nigeria. Bullet Chem Soc Ethiop. 23(1):9–17Google Scholar
  50. Veiga MM (2003) Mercury in artisanal gold mining in Latin America: facts, fantasies and solutions, UNIDO Expert Group Meeting-introducing new technologies for abatement of global mercury pollution deriving from artisanal gold miningm, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  51. WHO (2004) Guidelines for drinking water quality. 3rd edn. World Health Organization ISBN: 92- 4-154638-7. p 516Google Scholar
  52. WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. Water sanitation health. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_guidelines/en/
  53. WHO (2015) Country statistics, Nigeria. http://www.who.int/country/nga/en. Accessed 10 July 2016

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017