Skip to main content

Table 5 Mean (± SE) concentrations of selected plant macronutrients in onion leaves grown from soil amended with conventional fertilizer, compost, and compost + fertilizer during two growing seasons, Hidalgo County, Texas, 2009–2011 (n = 6 replications)

From: Effects of compost on onion quality, yield, and thrips infestation

Treatment

Datec

%N

P (ppm)

K (ppm)

Ca (ppm)

Mg (ppm)

Control

Feb 2010

2.4 ± 0.2b

6,951 ± 227a

33,322 ± 1,459

14,618 ± 562a

2,172 ± 69

Fertilizer

3.0 ± 0.2a

4,769 ± 320b

29,479 ± 1,713

12,576 ± 585b

2,212 ± 43

Compost

3.0 ± 0.2a

5,512 ± 442ab

31,175 ± 646

12,566 ± 370b

2,141 ± 66

C + Fa

3.3 ± 0.1a

4,859 ± 406b

30,818 ± 750

12,545 ± 356b

2,142 ± 65

Fb

4.62

7.87

2.38

4.77

0.27

P

0.0193

0.0022

0.1105

0.0157

0.8469

Control

Mar 2011

1.8 ± 0.1b

5,606 ± 127c

25,430 ± 4,609b

15,096 ± 402a

2,236 ± 44b

Fertilizer

2.4 ± 0.1a

7,195 ± 106a

33,128 ± 1,431ab

12,534 ± 192b

2,362 ± 60ab

Compost

2.4 ± 0.1a

6,868 ± 252a

33,584 ± 1,277a

12,909 ± 454b

2,415 ± 75ab

C + Fa

2.4 ± 0.1a

6,060 ± 257a

34,135 ± 496a

14,843 ± 390a

2,580 ± 44a

Fb

26.26

10.37

3.33

11.28

6.71

P

 < 0.0001

0.0006

0.0481

0.0004

0.0043

  1. Means in the same column and within the same sampling date followed by different letters are different (P < 0.05), Tukey’s HSD
  2. aC + F, compost + fertilizer
  3. bdf = 3, 23
  4. c25 Feb 2010 and 3 Mar 2011