Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean (± SE) concentrations of plant micronutrients in onion soil amended with conventional fertilizer, compost, and compost + conventional fertilizer during two growing seasons, Hidalgo County, Texas, 2009–2011 (n = 6 replications)

From: Effects of compost on onion quality, yield, and thrips infestation

Treatment

Datea

Na (ppm)

Fe (ppm)

Zn (ppm)

Mn (ppm)

Cu (ppm)

Control

Oct 2009

93 ± 5

4 ± 0.3

0.4 ± 0c

3 ± 0.2b

0.5 ± 0b

Fertilizer

98 ± 3

5 ± 0.2

0.7 ± 0bc

9 ± 0.8a

0.9 ± 0.1a

Compost

84 ± 3

4 ± 0.6

1.1 ± 0.1ab

8 ± 0.7a

0.8 ± 0.2ab

C + Fb

95 ± 6

5 ± 0.4

1.3 ± 0.1a

8 ± 0.7a

0.9 ± 0.1a

Fc

2.54

0.63

15.8 2

15.61

4.44

P

0.0958

0.6075

0.0001

0.0001

0.0201

Control

Mar 2010

105 ± 5

4 ± 0.1

0.4 ± 0b

3 ± 0.2c

0.6 ± 0.1

Fertilizer

91 ± 6

4 ± 0.2

0.4 ± 0.1b

6 ± 0.5b

0.8 ± 0.1

Compost

86 ± 2

4 ± 0.2

1.0 ± 0.1a

5 ± 0.2bc

0.8 ± 0.1

C + Fb

92 ± 5

4 ± 0.2

1.2 ± 0.1a

9 ± 1.1a

0.8 ± 0.1

Fc

2.80

0.47

24.39

15.68

1.96

P

0.07054

0.7057

 < 0.0001

0.0001

0.1627

Control

Nov 2010

122 ± 6a

4 ± 0.2

0.5 ± 0.1b

5 ± 0.2b

0.7 ± 0.1

Fertilizer

124 ± 6a

4 ± 0.3

0.5 ± 0.1b

6 ± 0.2ab

0.7 ± 0.1

Compost

80 ± 4b

4 ± 0.2

1.0 ± 0.1a

6 ± 0.5ab

0.7 ± 0.1

C + Fb

81 ± 5b

4 ± 0.2

1.1 ± 0.1a

7 ± 0.3a

0.7 ± 0.1

Fc

17.75

0.99

40.76

6.00

0.21

P

 < 0.0001

0.4232

 < 0.0001

0.0068

0.8882

Control

Mar 2011

197 ± 9a

4 ± 0.1

0.5 ± 0.1c

5 ± 0.1b

0.6 ± 0.1b

Fertilizer

 

187 ± 10a

4 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.1c

9 ± 1.4a

0.6 ± 0.1b

Compost

116 ± 12b

4 ± 0.1

0.9 ± 0.1b

5 ± 0.1b

0.7 ± 0.1a

C + Fb

135 ± 13b

4 ± 0.3

1.2 ± 0.1b

8 ± 0.9ab

0.7 ± 0.1a

Fc

12.31

2.02

142.61

7.35

4.50

P

0.0003

0.1538

 < 0.0001

0.0030

0.0193

  1. Means in the same column and within the same sampling date followed by different letters are different (P > 0.05, Tukey’s HSD)
  2. a27 Oct 2009, 10 Mar and 30 Nov 2010, and 15 Mar 2011
  3. bC + F, compost + fertilizer
  4. cdf = 3, 23