Skip to main content

Table 4 TWW Treatment Efficiency of HSSFCW with Gravel and Pumice Substrate and Planted with CZ at Different HRT

From: Developing horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland using pumice and Chrysopogon zizanioides for tannery wastewater treatment

Parameters

Influent conc.(mg/l)

3 days HRT

5 days HRT

7 days HRT

9 days HRT

Pumice (%)

Gravel (%)

Pumice (%)

Gravel (%)

Pumice (%)

Gravel (%)

Pumice (%)

Gravel (%)

BOD5

1641 ± 373.55

83.36

89.05

95.49

89.58

96.42

90.96

96.30

91.85

COD

6953.33 ± 339.41

92.34

93.82

96.76

95.81

96.91

95.94

96.62

96.33

NH4-N

253.33 ± 11.6

89.41

19.08

98.03

34.47

98.16

52.63

97.30

61.97

NO3-N

116.66 ± 26.63

90.72

66.29

100

77.15

99.68

80.86

99.51

86.00

TN

650.33 ± 93.62

93.54

68.27

98.67

86.11

99.00

90.42

98.56

88.67

PO4-P

88.06 ± 40.77

92.81

90.92

96.55

95.20

96.97

95.68

100

96.33

TP

144.53 ± 20.75

86.39

88.47

94.79

88.93

96.17

91.47

41.97

92.16

TSS

1868 ± 863.1

94.66

95.41

95.77

95.93

95.72

96.09

96.04

96.25

TDS

5877.3 ± 2294.77

74.39

79.96

78.24

79.95

86.92

81.96

86.42

81.23

TCr

18.33 ± 6.66

95.20

96.40

98.36

97.27

98.91

97.44

98.09

97.27