Skip to main content

Table 4 Interaction effects of landscape positions and land use types on water retentive capacity and water stable aggregates (mean ± SE)

From: Effects of landscape positions on soil physicochemical properties at Shenkolla Watershed, South Central Ethiopia

Water holding capacity at FC

 Lower

29.00 ± 0.000

33.67 ± 0.333

41.00 ± 0.000

34.56 ± 1.749a

 Medium

23.67 ± 0.333

28.33 ± 0.235

35.33 ± 0.667

29.11 ± 1.584ab

 Upper

18.67 ± 0.333

22.67 ± 0.333

28.33 ± 2.400

23.22 ± 1.711c

 Total

23.78 ± 1.498a

28.22 ± 1.597ab

34.89 ± 1.889c

Water holding capacity at PWP

 Lower

17.00 ± 0.203

18.67 ± 0.882

22.00 ± 1.000

19.22 ± 0.830a

 Medium

12.67 ± 0.230

14.33 ± 0.333

19.33 ± 0.882

15.44 ± 1.042abc

 Upper

8.33 ± 0.333

10.33 ± 0.318

18.33 ± 0.667

12.33 ± 1.546c

 Total

12.67 ± 1.258a

14.44 ± 1.237ab

19.89 ± 0.696c

AWC

 Lower

12.00 ± 0.000

15.00 ± 1.000

18.33 ± 0.882

15.11 ± 0.992a

 Medium

11.00 ± 0.000

14.00 ± 0.000

16.00 ± 0.577

13.67 ± 0.745ab

 Upper

10.00 ± 0.095

12.33 ± 0.333

10.00 ± 1.000

10.78 ± 0.494c

 Total

11.00 ± 0.289a

13.78 ± 0.494abc

14.78 ± 1.310c

STA

 Lower

69.50 ± 0.500

73.67 ± 0.333

81.33 ± 0.333

74.86 ± 1.724

 Medium

68.33 ± 0.882

72.00 ± 0.000

80.67 ± 0.333

73.67 ± 1.869

 Upper

67.67 ± 0.333

71.33 ± 0.667

80.00 ± 0.577

72.90 ± 1.855

 Total

68.46 ± 0.366a

72.27 ± 0.402b

80.70 ± 0.254bc

  1. Means in the same row for land use and in the same column for landscape position followed by the similar letters are not significantly different at (p = 0.05)