Skip to main content

Table 8 Estimates of logistic regression without agro-ecological dummies

From: Conservational tree growing by smallholder farm households: evidence from Gamo highlands of Southern Ethiopia

Logistic regression

Number of obs = 335

Wald chi2(12) =  40.37

Prob > chi2 = 0.0001

Log pseudo likelihood = -162.13686

Pseudo R2 = 0.2782

OFATR

Coef

Robust Std. Err

z

P > z

[95% Conf. Interval]

GEND

− .68071

.521727

− 1.30

0.192

− 1.703276

.3418561

FAMS

.0430281

.0621043

0.69

0.488

− .0786942

.1647503

AGE

.0089223

.0146305

0.61

0.542

− .019753

.0375977

EDUCCAT

.0309713

.2063623

0.15

0.881

− .3734913

.435434

OCCUP

.2410158

.3420199

0.70

0.481

− .4293308

.9113624

ACLF

.0131217

.1016852

0.13

0.897

− .1861777

.2124211

FARMS

− .3671371

.1599601

− 2.30

0.022

− .6806531

− .053621

YTR

.5852743

.3019399

1.94

0.053

− .006517

1.177066

TGEXP

4.376642

1.054511

4.15

0.000

2.309838

6.443446

AVATR

.1953668

.2982566

0.66

0.512

− .3892054

.779939

TRAIN

.3873335

.2955154

1.31

0.190

− .1918661

.966533

SULNTR

1.590531

.7841496

2.03

0.043

.053626

3.127436

_cons

− 5.542972

1.257009

− 4.41

0.000

− 8.006665

− 3.07928

  1. Source: Authors’ computation based on field survey