Skip to main content

Table 6 Reviewed studies dealing with erosion regulation/sediment yields including its methodology and monetary value

From: Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis

No

Authors and study site

Valuation methods

Estimate per hectare year−1

Total FES

1

Morri et al. (2014), in Foglia, Italy

Avoided cost of restoring soil

1.79 × 106£ year−1

–

2

Morri et al. (2014), in Maracchia, Italy

Avoided cost of restoring soil

1.72 × 106£ year−1

–

3

Vogl et al. (2016), in Bashpa II, India

Using RUSEL by InVEST model

630,124 ton year−1

–

4

Vogl et al. (2016), in Ghanvi watershed, India

Using RUSEL by InVEST model

28,335 ton year−1

–

5

Duc et al. (2018)

Replacement cost method

1 million US$ year−1

–

6

Ninan and Inoue (2013a), Japan

Hedonic pricing

310,311.746 US$ year−1

–

7

Ninan and Inoue (2013a), Japan

Opportunity cost

31,122.21 US$ year−1

–

8

Kibria et al. (2017), Cambodia

Cost of per ton of sediment removal

32 US$ ha−1 year−1

1.76 million