Table 4 Reviewed studies dealing with timber production including its methodology and monetary value

1

Joshi and Negi (2011), India (Oak forest)

Based on the prevailing cost paid for minor timber

26,509RS year⁻¹ (8 tons/head year⁻¹)

–

2

Joshi and Negi (2011), India (Pine forest)

Based on the prevailing cost paid

for minor timber

11,096RS. year⁻¹ (4 tons/head year⁻¹)

–

3

Kibria et al. (2017), Cambodia

Direct market valuation

6.37 m³ year⁻¹

350 US$

4

Ojea et al. (2012), sustainable harvest

Stumpage price

18.78£ ha⁻¹ year⁻¹

–

5

Ojea et al. (2012), unsustainable harvest

Stumpage price

56.28£ ha⁻¹ year⁻¹

–

6

Uddin et al. (2013)

Direct valuation method

0.4 × 10⁶ US$ year⁻¹

–

7

Huxham et al. (2015), Kenya

Market price (deduct harvest and production cost)

206 US$ ha⁻¹

–

8

Häyhä et al. (2015), Italy

Volume of harvest

89,500 m³ year⁻¹

–

9

Häyhä et al. (2015), Italy

The market value of timber

218£ ha⁻¹ year⁻¹

8,693,135£ year⁻¹

10

Gaodi et al. (2010). 2010, China

Market price method (for timber)

391.16 × 106¥ (in 2004)

–

11

Kanungwe et al. (2013), Zambia

Cash income reported by households

1834KR year^−1a

–

12

Alarcon et al. (2015)

InVEST model

US$ 65.4 ha⁻¹ year⁻¹

–

13

Verkerk et al. (2014)

Round wood prices (industrial- and fuelwood)

73 million m³ year⁻¹

–

14

Delphin et al. (2016)

Using InVEST model

Mean of 109.5 tons in 2003

–

15

Tilahun et al. (2016)

Stumpage value

The volume of 279.59 m³ ha⁻¹ worth of 131.22 $ ha⁻¹

–

16

Mutoko et al. (2015)

Willingness to pay

6 US$ ha⁻¹ year⁻¹

107,000US$