Table 3 Reviewed studies dealing with water yield including the methodology and monetary value
No | Authors and study site | Valuation methods | Estimate per hectare year−1 | Total FES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Vogl et al. (2016), India (Baspa II) | InVEST water yield model | – | 1190 mm year−1 |
2 | Vogl et al. (2016), India (Ghanvi I watershed) | InVEST water yield model | – | 1598 mm year−1 |
3 | Duc et al. (2018), Vietnam | Residual valuation model | 68.42 million US$ year−1 | 161.5 million US$ year−1 |
4 | Ninan and Inoue (2013a) in Japan | Alternative cost | 1.385 billion US$ year−1 | – |
5 | Kibria et al. (2017), Cambodia | Rainfall storage method | 399 US$/ha year−1 | 22.21 million US$/ha year−1 |
6 | Li et al. (2017), China | Avoided cost of detention of a unit of water | 147.75 × 109 m3 year−1 | – |
7 | Mamat et al. (2018), in China | Adopt the benefit transfer method of Costanza et al. (1997) and Xie et al. (2008) | 11, 877.67 US$ ha−1 year−1 | – |
8 | Gaodi et al. (2010), China | Replacement price method of water resource | 331.92 × 106 ¥ in 2004 | – |
9 | Biao et al. (2008), in Beijing | Adopt based on monthly precipitation and surface runoff (Li and Chen 1997) | 287 × 106 m3 of fresh water | – |
10 | Morri et al. (2014) in Marecchia (Italy) | Direct market price | 2.9 × 106 US$ year−1 |  |
11 | Morri et al. (2014) in Foglia (Italy) | Direct market price | 3.1 × 106 US$ year−1 |  |
12 | Beier et al. (2017) | using an estimate of avoided treatment (i.e., liming) costs | On average from $49.98 ha−1 to $7.22 ha−1 | – |
13 | Delphin et al. (2016) | InVEST model | Mean of 1290 × 103 m3 in 2003 | – |
14 | Bernard et al. (2009) | Avoided cost method | US$169,470 year−1 | – |