Table 3 Optimal pumping strategies found using SME, MGO and PBMO for formulation 1 at Umatilla compared with existing RIP design
From: Groundwater remediation design using physics-based flow, transport, and optimization technologies
Name | Location (Layer, Row, Column) | Pumping/injection rate (gpm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIP | Formulation 1 solutions | |||||
SME design | MGO | PBMO | ||||
Stress period 1 | Stress period 2 | Stress period 1 | Stress period 1 | |||
EW-1 | (1,60,65) | −128 | −280 | −350 | −307.5 | −292.5 |
EW-2 | (1,83,84) | |||||
EW-3 | (1,53,59) | −105 | −360 | −219.5 | −292.5 | |
EW-4 | (1,85,86) | −887 | −660 | |||
New-1 (T&E) | (1,48,57) | −100 | ||||
New-2 (T&E) | (1,49,58) | −230 | −360 | |||
New-3 (MGO) | (1,48,59) | −360 | ||||
New-4 (MGO) | (1,48,55) | −283 | ||||
New-5 (PBMO) | (1,48,57) | −292.5 | ||||
New-6 (PBMO) | (1,52,61) | −292.5 | ||||
IF-L | * | |||||
IF-1 | * | 233 | 282 | 585 | ||
IF-2 | * | 405 | 405 | 380 | 390 | |
IF-3 | * | 483 | 482 | 790 | 780 | |
IF-4 | * | 585 | ||||
IF-A | * | |||||
IF-B | * | |||||
IF-C | * | |||||
Total cost in net present value ($) | $3,836,285 | $2,230,905 | $1,664,395 | $1,644,085 | ||